| Significant Accomplishments | |||||
| Overall Conservation Management | |||||
INTRODUCTION
| Training Mission | BACKGROUND
| Integrated Natural Resource Management Plan | Cooperative Agreements | Organization/Staffing | PROGRAM SUMMARY | SIGNIFICANT ACCOMPLISHMENTS | Overall
Conservation Mgmt | Ecosystem Mgmt | Forest Mgmt | Land Use Mgmt | Wildlife Mgmt | Pest Mgmt | Conservation Education | Community Relations | Mission Enhancement | Environmental Enhancement | |
|||||
| Environmental office staff have combined their concerns about forestry, archaeology, outdoor recreation, wildlife, aesthetics, and threatened and endangered species with the military mission and other base operations. Through detailed field surveys and application of GIS technology, long-range planning, and data analysis, Camp Ripley has made significant strides toward better understanding and management of installation resources. | |||||
| Natural Resource Planning | ||
For planning purposes, Camp Ripley has recently been divided into blocks called natural resource management areas (Figure 3, Table 4). These areas were defined through interpretation of infrared aerial photography, study of maps and databases, and discussions between environmental staff and military operations personnel. They integrated expected military use, natural ecosystems, multiple natural resource potentials, and natural resource policy applications within contiguous land units. This co-process of natural resource planning and site development planning has resulted in newly defined maneuver area boundaries identical to the larger natural resource management areas. |
||||||
Table 4. Natural Resource Management Areas identified through a joint planning process. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Watersheds | ||
| A detailed database of watershed boundaries and hydrological units was created in 1996. Each hydrological unit is managed for military training in addition to erosion control and maintenance of quality wildlife habitat. Remediation of heavily used areas is regularly conducted routinely using hydro seeding, planting of native grasses, and rotation of land use activities. These practices in watershed management are compatible with national watershed regulatory initiatives. | ||
| Land Condition Trend Analysis | ||
| The Land Condition
Trend Analysis (LCTA) program was initiated at Camp Ripley in 1991. LCTA is a program that
provides for inventorying and monitoring biological and physical resource data as a means
of quantifying the condition of the land. An initial inventory of the flora and fauna of
Camp Ripley was completed by the MN DNR. In addition, 189 permanent field plots have been
installed to monitor trends in land condition over time. Over half of the plots (108
plots) are referred to as special use plots since they are intended to monitor intense
land use areas (e.g., maneuver corridors, assembly areas, etc.). The remaining plots (81
plots) are core plots that were randomly located throughout Camp Ripley based on
vegetation cover types. The LCTA program has generated valuable resource data for performing environmental reviews in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act process, land management decisions, and implementation of the INRMP. Results to date suggest that most impacts from military use are concentrated in a few areas. Data have also shown differences in tactical concealment resources between core and special use plots of the same habitat type, indicating less concealment in special use plots. Additionally, there was more military disturbance and bare ground on the special use plots. These trends indicate that military training can damage natural resources. The results have enabled the Environmental and Operations personnel to assist military trainers in better distribution of their training exercises which has decreased the impact of training on natural resources. The results of LCTA have also enhanced the ability to monitor and evaluate the condition of Camp Ripleys land resources and, where necessary, have provided a foundation for implementing land rehabilitation. Recommendations have included increasing accuracy of data collection and making the data more usable. Data collection accuracy has been improved through methodological developments specific to floral and faunal groups at Camp Ripley, and database utility has been improved with a Range Facility Management Support System (RFMSS). RFMSS provides detailed military use data that is currently being compared with LCTA data to help determine cause and effect relationships (e.g., what types and levels of use cause what types of damage?). |
||
|
||